The article was not promoted 01:50, 7 May 2008.
I'm nominating this article for featured article because I believe this meets all FA criteria. The article recently went through a rigerous GAN and subsequent cleanup. There are no {{ fact}} tags or any remaining issues from the GAN. The only issue could be a bit of jargon in the meteorological sypnosis. The article was revied by a WP:SEVERE member who understands some of the complex terms. Otherwise, I believe all statements are referenced using Cite Web fully. Thank you, Southern Illinois SKYWARN ( talk) 01:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Comments
I believe I have put access dates on all references now! Southern Illinois SKYWARN ( talk) 20:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC) reply
These are just a few examples; the text needs some work yet I think. -- Malleus Fatuorum ( talk) 15:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Reply
Reply
I am withdrawing this nomination, and I will be taking a Wikibreak for a long time. Southern Illinois SKYWARN ( talk) 01:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC) reply