Hell's teeth! You would think he would have learned his lesson by now. Anyway, I don't have access to the deleted article so I can't say whether it would be worth bringing it back or whether it might be better to start just from scratch. Either way, he probably is notable now. So, as somebody who !voted "weak delete" on the AfD, I have no objection to it being undeleted.
DanielRigal (
talk) 18:58, 2 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Closing admin comment: Since this was deleted on the basis of
WP:BLP1E, and he doesn't seem to be a 1E anymore, I don't see a problem with restoring this. However, I do have a question for
User:Jonas1015119. Are you seeking undeletion of the previously deleted article, or to create a new one (perhaps from the draft at
Draft:Miles Routledge)? --
RL0919 (
talk) 21:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)reply
I'd be fine with either, though considering the current submissions queue and the fact that hes in the news now, a recreation would probably more helpful, the current draft seems to be decent. I'm not sure which would be more appropriate in cases like these. --
jonas (
talk) 22:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)reply
If the previous content isn't being restored, you probably didn't need a DRV, but since we are here, I'm fine with formally saying allow re-creation, just to head off an inappropriate G4 speedy deletion. --
RL0919 (
talk) 02:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)reply
Allow Re-Creation, either by submitting draft or by creating article at risk of
AFD. Title is not salted.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 04:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)reply
In the circumstances we should clearly have an article about Mr Routledge.—
S MarshallT/
C 07:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is an archive of the
deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.