From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

6 January 2011

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-01-06 Edit

2011-01-06 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • No copyright concern. False positive. But likely soon to be deleted via AfD Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Scanned for other potential sources via Earwig and found none. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:58, 11 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Original G12d; new article seems clear. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Cut & paste move fixed and extensive copyvios in original article removed. Article moved to this title, as it seems to be accurate. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Only one sentence was not added by the creator of the newer article, but I've attributed. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Too many quotes for body of article. Stubbed. Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:56, 12 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. PD-USGov. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:56, 12 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. Some explanation as to why works are creative at editor's talk. VernoWhitney ( talk) 14:56, 12 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- MLauba ( Talk) 21:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. A verbatim reproduction of mere facts and figures (the exhibition names, places and dates). Not a vio but definitely not encyclopedic IMO -- MLauba ( Talk) 21:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Slp1 ( talk) 21:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This was deleted and recreated clean, but since the new version was pretty much A7able, I've expanded it a bit. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Added by an IP. Not sure this guy is really notable; tagged for "Primary" sources. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:53, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • The tag has been removed. I'll leave it to the tagger to note if concerns persist, since the source is Dutch. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2011_January_6&oldid=1138426200"