No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Single short factual sentence.
VernoWhitney (
talk) 00:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Giovanni Battista Caviglia(
history ·
last edit) from
[1]. Article seems to be translation from the
german WP. German Article is obviously a direct translation of the given source, so this Article seems to be sort of a retranslation... I labelled the german Article too. --
Adornix (
talk) 09:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Article blanked for evaluation and closure through
WP:CP. It seems to be an article of definitions from legislation (for whatever encyclopedic purpose that is), but the
legal notice on the website explicitly claims copyright.
VernoWhitney (
talk) 15:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Let's give this one a bit more time to see how the discussion plays out on the status of the EU. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 13:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Most of WP article pre-dates the newspaper article. Paraphrase sentences seem to have been added in one edit
here. Not much editing since, so little would be lost if we reverted to
last edit pre-copyvio. Image, added more recently, needs to be retained.
PamD (
talk) 11:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Thanks. Have done, but the image may wind up deleted as well. It looks very much like a derivative work. --
Moonriddengirl(talk) 14:21, 29 October 2010 (UTC)reply