The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: merge, unnecessary complex tree for only three articles in total.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 22:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
NLeeuw (
talk) 14:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Chitrali cuisine
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary; Only one article in category, which is the titular article
Chitrali cuisine.
Chitrali cuisine has also already been added to the proper categories, so we don't need a merge.
ForsythiaJo (
talk) 22:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The category is meanwhile empty. Presumably this is a case of speedy
WP:C2F anyway.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 23:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment Yes, this category has been emptied. No need to come to CFD. LizRead!Talk! 01:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Categories containing only 1 article. Unlikely to be expanded since the group has been inactive for 40 years.
Mika1h (
talk) 12:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: See
comment by
Pppery. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 17:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep While not a guideline, there is consensus per
WP:ALBUMSTYLE "that a category for an artist's albums should be created even if they have only released one album (irrespective of whether they are likely to release more in the future)." — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (
talk •
contribs) 18:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Does that still apply if there is no article for the artist?
USA for Africa redirects to the single. –
FayenaticLondon 08:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 20:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dutch cookies
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The articles in that category were original part of both categories you have mentioned. Hence the overcategorization-claim. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
The Banner (
talk •
contribs) 15:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 18:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 20:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:WikiProject Film task force usage
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Outdated WikiProject tracking categories, no longer applied or used by the template that formerly used them. {{WikiProject Film}} used to feature code that would count how many of the project's task forces any given film had been assigned to, and automatically sort the page into one of these categories accordingly -- but it no longer does, so none of these categories are still in any use because the template isn't populating them anymore. They can of course be recreated in the future if they're ever actually needed again, but there's no need to indefinitely hold onto them if they're not actually being used.
Bearcat (
talk) 19:00, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Russo-Turkish War (1672-1681)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Recently created new category with an error in its name. The two articles filed here both say that the Russo-Turkish war that they were part of began in 1676, not 1672 -- and indeed, we have an article titled
Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681), but none titled
Russo-Turkish War (1672–1681). Meanwhile, there's a completely separate article about a
Polish–Ottoman War (1672–1676), but the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was not part of Russia in that era, so they aren't the same thing and wouldn't belong in one merged category. I'm not sure whether the creator just made a typo or actually merged two separate wars together, but this category should be renamed and have
Russo-Turkish War (1676–1681) added to it as its head article (although I'm not inclined to preemptively add it to the wrongly-named category in the interim.)
Bearcat (
talk) 14:37, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:5th-century Irish literature
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Isolated category, not currently useful for navigation as it only holds
5th-century Irish writers, which is already in all the parent categories via other hierarchies. –
FayenaticLondon 09:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Redirects from gender
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The current title,
Category:Redirects from gender, was a little confusing to me - at first, the name suggested to me that this category (and the
related template) might be for categorizing redirects from the name of a
gender identity. I propose moving it to the more specific title
Category:Redirects from gendered terms, in order to clarify the purpose of this redirect category and remove the potential ambiguity.
Support, this makes it a lot clearer.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 11:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Support, this wording makes more sense. ~
Eejit43 (
talk) 12:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Spinozist philosophers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Redundant with either
Category:Spinozists (adherents to Spinoza's philosophy) or
Category:Spinoza scholars (philosophers who produce scholarship on Spinoza, independent of their own inclination).
All current members of this category are also in one of those two categories.
Psychastes (
talk) 03:40, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. In addition, the description on the category page is such that it is hardly a defining characteristic, more a case of
WP:OCASSOC.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 11:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.