The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:12th-century Spanish sculptors
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge per nom. One rarely gets sculptors' names at this period.
Johnbod (
talk) 02:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Earthquakes in the Umayyad Caliphate
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
That also works.
NLeeuw (
talk) 21:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Government of the Aq Qoyunlu
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Government of the Ghaznavid Empire
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Government of the Timurid Empire
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Pretenders part 1
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge for now, these are not currently not helpful for navigation.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 20:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge for all the reasons listed.
Mason (
talk) 01:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:20th-century Spanish Roman Catholics
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete per
WP:OCEGRS, trivial intersection with gender. Merging is not necessary, the single article is already in
Category:Asian ghosts.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 11:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. And I would also support containerizing
Category:Female ghosts, to discourage gendering individual ghosts
Mason (
talk) 14:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose Splitting by gender is not trivial for living people, fictional characters, mythological figures or folklore figures. It's the simplest most commonplace way to difuse categories, and gender has and continues to have defining impact on all humans and all reflections of humans in culture.
★Trekker (
talk) 08:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose deleting/containerizing for these same reasons. Gender is a useful distinction for categories about real people, fictional characters, and mythical figures alike.
AHI-3000 (
talk) 01:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep per discussion, spookily defining. Both categories are well stocked (especially the female ghosts) and informative to readers interested in the topic.
Randy Kryn (
talk) 09:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose Gender is a defining aspect of the topic. There are many variations of the
White Lady ghost, and specific reports of ghostly nuns.
Dimadick (
talk) 13:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People educated at Skerry's College
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining.
Skerry's College wasn't an individual college, it was a series of courses that preped you for the civil servants examine.
Mason (
talk) 04:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep Highly defining and probably too thinly populated. That
Skerry's College was a commercial chain of schools, plus early
distance learning, is neither here nor there. For working class people it was one of very few options for post-schoool education available in the UK at the time, & a key element of the biographies of the working-class heroes in the category.
Johnbod (
talk) 21:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:British LGBT civil servants
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining intersection between being LGBT and being a civil servant. Per EGRS, the intersection must be relevant. Notably, there isn't a LGBT civil servant category.
Mason (
talk) 04:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rhythm games
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Some may not agree with me but there are several reasons I have for this merge. First of all, many video games labeled as a rhythm game in their articles are instead located in
Category:Music video games, and now especially since I recently removed all subcategories in this category except for Rhythmic action games. Secondly, the five languages that this category is also in (please ignore the French version since it has over a hundred articles but was created over a decade ago unlike the English version) have only a few articles in each one. Finally, rhythm game and music game may be different things, but the category for music video games as whole contains subcategories for various types of music game, often distinct from rhythm games, such as Karaoke or Dance games.
QuantumFoam66 (
talk) 04:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose, I can't really see a problem here, neither of the three arguments is convincing. If many articles about rhythm games are not in this category yet, they should be added.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose Rhythm games are a distinct genre unto themselves with their own article separate from music games. Not all music games are rhythm based.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 16:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Speedy close, I guess this didn't really mean anything at the end. My bad.
QuantumFoam66 (
talk) 18:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Video games about undead and monsters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: I honestly want the category Video games about legendary creatures to be reverted, neither category alone is very populated in either way.
QuantumFoam66 (
talk) 03:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose for same reasons given below. Also you should've notified me about this too.
AHI-3000 (
talk) 19:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose Because you "want" something is not an argument. And subcategories that are populated still means the parent category is populated, unless it's a non-defining intersection.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 16:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Federation of Asian Muaythai Associations member associations
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Music series
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: So it is a video game series titled "Music". "Music series" is a bit to board i think.
QuantumFoam66 (
talk) 01:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Support Per reasoning of the nominator. That's what the series article would be called if there was one.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 16:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rota (island)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: To match article name - moved due to recent consensus that
WP:USPLACE covers U.S. territories. --
Beland (
talk) 06:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 00:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Tinian
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: To match article name, which was changed per recent consensus that
WP:USPLACE applies to U.S. territories. --
Beland (
talk) 06:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 00:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Saipan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: To match the article name, which was just changed because of recent consensus that
WP:USPLACE applies to U.S. territories. --
Beland (
talk) 06:47, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
WP:USPLACE does not apply to islands, does it? Besides articles about towns on Saipan are formatted as "town, Saipan", not as "town, Northern Mariana Islands".
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:48, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 00:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sexuality-related controversies in film
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: After purging, there is a single member of the category (
Roman Polanski sexual abuse case). Upmerge to parents for now without prejudice against recreation if it can be appropriately populated. HouseBlaster (
talk · he/him) 00:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose "purging" before the nom. I agree with Marco that the Polanski article should not be in any "film" category. I took a look at
Category:Obscenity controversies in film, and someone has been wildly over-categorising. I removed the first four films I looked at (see my history) - there might or might not have been "obscenity" in the films, but there was no trace of a controversy over that. Also there was a lot of double-booking with
Category:Film controversies. I find it hard to believe we could not populate a
Category:Sexuality-related controversies in film but now it is all but empty I can't tell. What has been going on?
Johnbod (
talk) 02:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Johnbod: the idea is that these categories should not contain articles about films which are involved in controversies, but articles about film controversies themselves. (And I should've been more clear in the nomination that the purging was as a result of a CfD, not something I undertook on my own.) HouseBlaster (
talk · he/they) 23:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.