The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
support per parent article --
Lenticel(
talk) 23:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Football clubs in North East India
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:State or union territory is used for other football clubs in India. The single current entry is from Arunachal Pradesh, and the proposed category would follow the aforementioned scheme.
Kaffet i halsen (
talk) 21:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 17:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Rename and re-parent per Marcocapelle.
GiantSnowman 17:02, 17 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Rename and re-parent per Marcocapelle. --
Lenticel(
talk) 23:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Viceroys in Europe
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge, this is just wordplay. In Spain, governors were called viceroy because the respective regions were de jure separate kingdoms (not de facto, of course).
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Ice hockey players by defunct team
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge all - I looked in other sports for similar schemes but found
very little.
Oculi (
talk) 15:32, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nobility in Europe
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Given that Ukraine wasn't a country until the 20th century, I hardly think that the category "Ukrainian nobility" does make sense. Maybe that category should be split. (
t ·
c) buidhe 14:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
And then rename all Fooian nobility to nobility in Fooland? Nobody is saying we should do that next. This CfR is about continents, not countries/states/territories within those continents.
Nederlandse Leeuw (
talk) 23:49, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
I was planning to CfR the other "Nobility by continent" categories from Fooian-continental nobility to Nobility in continent Foo next after
Category:European nobility was renamed to
Category:Nobility in Europe two days ago (13 June), but you immediately proposed to reverse this renaming yesterday (14 June), 27.5 hours later. I didn't see the result of the CfR within those 27.5 hours, so I didn't yet submit a follow-up CfR, but you saw that the continental categories were named inconsistently and tried to bring "in Europe" back in line with "European" without realising it was recently renamed deliberately, and the other ones were slated for renaming soon as well. So I think there has been a bit of a misunderstanding, I hope I have cleared it up now.
Nederlandse Leeuw (
talk) 06:12, 15 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Follow the result of the earlier CfD with respect to splitting the Americas. Neutral about the rename.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Alt rename use the alternative format of "Nobility in continent". since its much clearer. --
64.229.90.172 (
talk) 05:13, 15 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Support alt. I do not support "rename all Fooian nobility to nobility in Fooland".
Laurel Lodged (
talk) 10:27, 23 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rename, the format "of ... nations" is hardly ever used.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 17:26, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Trade unionists from Queensland
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Struck my delete vote after below discussion.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 03:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep both categories since they now have at least 5 members.
ミラP@
Miraclepine 23:19, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Since there are at least 5 members of each, I now support keep.
LibStar (
talk) 23:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)reply
@
Miraclepine: if you want to keep them, please populate them further. The purpose of a category is not to have 5 articles in it, the purpose is to have all articles in it that comply with the criteria. Nobody is served with a category where most articles are lacking.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.