The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Delete per
WP:NARROWCAT. Too narrow an intersection between ET's and royalty for a category to be needed.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 15:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Weak keep Can easily be expanded, e.g.
King Dedede does not belong in either subcategory, and the two current subcategories respectively contain 42 pages, so it is not
WP:SMALLCAT. It is unclear, however, if NARROWCAT still applies as an intersection that does not warrant splitting. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 00:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 00:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - surely fictional extraterrestrial royalty is not limited to emperors and princesses. In any case the nom should be 'upmerge to all parents', not delete.
Oculi (
talk) 10:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep I see no relevance of OVERCAT here, and Oculi has already pointed to scope for expansion.
Dimadick (
talk) 14:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 21:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: To match some other existing categories in the surrounding hierarchies. The last four were tagged by
user:Ali17082001 in August without starting a discussion. –
FayenaticLondon 21:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment, instead we might rename the surrounding "frogs and toads" categories to just "frogs". At least there should be some consistency.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)reply
CommentToad is just a common name used for various families of frogs, based on a perceived similarity in their appearance. They are not a distinct taxonomic group.
Dimadick (
talk) 13:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 21:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Rename any 'frogs and toads' categories to 'frogs' and create 'toads' subcats if necessary, as
Category:Toads is a subcat of
Category:Frogs. Support the last one as
Category:Leporidae corresponds to 'rabbits and hares'.
Oculi (
talk) 01:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Support option B, the usage of "toads" in the category name is redundant.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:20, 20 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Professors by rank of the Academy of Arts
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This category relates to the
Imperial Academy of Arts. I cant see what "by rank" signifies, but perhaps I'm missing something.
Rathfelder (
talk) 21:40, 8 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 21:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer, most categories by raion have been upmerged in previous CfD discussions.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 14:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Privybst (
talk) 16:37, 23 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Rococo architecture by country
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support all per nom. --
Privybst (
talk) 16:37, 23 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: C2D. The league has been renamed.
Sørhaug (
talk) 10:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 14:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)reply
@
GiantSnowman That's where I tried to put them, but apparently I chose the wrong option in Twinkle.
Sørhaug (
talk) 11:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)reply
I think Twinkle doesn't work for speedy category renames.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 08:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedy rename per nom, C2D. As this was intended for the speedy section, this could be done immediately (as it's been more than 48 since proposed, and no objections).
Joseph2302 (
talk) 08:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Moldovan National Division players
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: C2D. The league has been renamed.
Sørhaug (
talk) 10:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 14:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Moldovan National Division managers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: C2D. The league has been renamed.
Sørhaug (
talk) 10:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 14:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Moldovan National Division
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: C2D. The league has been renamed.
Sørhaug (
talk) 10:27, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions.
GiantSnowman 14:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:1911 establishments in Lebanon
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, Lebanon did not exist yet before 1920 and we do not have a category tree by year for Lebanon before 1920.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. --
Privybst (
talk) 16:37, 23 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:NASCAR races at Dover International Speedway
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Track has not used the name "Dover International Speedway" in almost a year; has renamed to Dover Motor Speedway since being purchased by Speedway Motorsports, Inc.
Nascar9919 (
talk) 05:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support soft deletion, for now it is a redundant category layer.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 13:00, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Support other than Czechoslovakia, which has architects. The others do not: see
User:Oculi/sandbox3.
Oculi (
talk) 17:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.