The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support --
Seljuk (warlord) was the founder of a dynasty. it is thus (like Ottoman) imappropriate to trat it as if it were a demonym.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:56, 19 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. --
Just N. (
talk) 18:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom's convincing argument.--
Mvqr (
talk) 11:07, 23 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge per
WP:OVERLAPCAT, both categories mainly contain the different ministers plenipotentiary.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 21:32, 17 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:El Capitan Theatre premieres
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Having a premiere at a specific venue, is not notable. See a relevant discussion at
WT:FILMhere. -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 19:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom.
Chompy Ace 23:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Films about red
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Roads in Yarmouth, Maine
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge per nom. --
Just N. (
talk) 17:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Downmerge per Peterkingiron.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fantastic Fest alumni
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. –
FayenaticLondon 12:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Not defining.
Fantastic Fest screens dozens of films each year. That they "attended and presented films" at the festival doesn't tell you much about the "filmmakers and performers".
Nardog (
talk) 11:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Not sure how to phrase this exactly, but I created the category because Fantastic Fest is -- as the biggest genre film festival in the U.S. -- a very significant event for the scene, and often career-defining.
☆☆☆ interstellarpoliceman ☆☆☆ 12:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)reply
So is Sundance. So is Cannes. So is Sitges. But we don't have similar categories for them. "Attended and presented" is
WP:NONDEFINING. The list would be enormous and useless, especially if you include performers.
Nardog (
talk) 08:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete due to no indication that Fantastic Fest "breakthroughs" (a better word than "alumni" here) is noteworthy to have its own category. I'm not even sure if there could be good criteria to define what makes a person "break through". Winning awards? Getting their film acquired for commercial distribution? Getting lots of good reviews? Do second-time appearances at a festival count for "breaking through"? "Alumni" by itself is way too vague and easily means anyone who has ever had a film screened at the given festival.
Erik (
talk |
contrib) (
ping me) 14:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, not a defining characteristic of an individual. We do not categorize based on meta analyses.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 08:23, 25 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:LGBT history in the United States by region
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Twinkle is telling me to use CfD for stub templates, but the options it gives me are rename or delete. Really, I'm proposing to merge these two since both templates populate the same category, and any chef stubs are already bio stubs. The only difference I can see is the hierarchy table, which is what can be merged. -
2pou (
talk) 22:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:49, 17 February 2022 (UTC) reply
Agree with nom. A chef is a person, so it cannot be any other thing but a bio.
Gonnym (
talk) 19:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.