Category:LGBT-related controversies in Switzerland
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete unnecessary
Tazuco (
talk) 21:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete -
LGBT rights in Switzerland is not a controversy and is properly categorised otherwise. I would agree with the nom that many of Gng1999's category creations are of dubious value.
Oculi (
talk) 00:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Please don't delete my Switzerland LGBT controversies, Because i'm trying to be a new member, Because their homophobic controversies in it so i need to leave it on there. I'm autistic anyway, Sandstein.
Please don't delete my work. I'm know what i'm doing. I looked up at the work on UserTalk on LGBT rights on Switzerland.Please don't block me. I'm autistic anyway. I'm not joking.
Gng1999 (
talk) 07:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Ali Shariati
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete per
WP:OCEPON, the subcategory suffices.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Zaidi scholars
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, the two categories have the same scope.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Fine, we could delete this, I am just translating from Chinese Wikipedia.
QiuLiming1 (
talk) 15:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The category structure on the English Wikipedia is probably the most useful but inflexible organizing tool on the project. It's an interlinked pyramid and categories can not exist is isolation so kudos to Marcocapelle for assigning parent categories to this one. LizRead!Talk! 19:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom; no reason to separate by country. I've also nominated {{CN Current}} for deletion for a similar reason.
Elli (
talk |
contribs) 20:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.