The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, according to
Magnesia on the Meander, the city was the residence of some satraps of Lydia, i.e. Magnesia was apparently not a separate satrapy.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:18, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge Unless Magnesia is established as separate.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 10:09, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Inter-Services Public Relations songs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, article should be removed and then
WP:C1 applies.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Songs by recording studios have already been deleted, I'd get rid of songs by music publishers, unless an exception for pre-recorded music, the albums, songs by record label is a complete mess and I have no wish to approve of insubstantial categories. Rant over. --
Richhoncho (
talk) 08:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Murders of Paul Anlauf and Franz Lenck
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Reverse mergeTimrollpickering (
talk) 19:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Grama Niladhari divisions of Sri Lanka
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale, merge per
WP:SMALLCAT, only 1-3 articles per category about tiny 4th-level administrative divisions in Sri Lanka. Note that in most cases there is not even a parent category of a 3rd-level administrative division. Limited scope for expansion, it is more likely that the articles will be AfD'd some day, see also
this ANI discussion.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:22, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge All These seem like inherently small categories (less than 5) with little growth potential.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 10:16, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedians interested in abstract algebra
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, very narrow topic, category is populated by the same two editors as in Lie algebra below (so no need to merge).
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support As someone affected by this and the Lie algebra merge below, I have no formal objection to the merge of over-specific categories. But I think one problem not necessarily addressed is that both algebra and the quadratic equation in the userbox suggest "high school algebra" versus the study of mathematical objects. Unfortunately, "abstract algebra" is a too-specific term of art as I understand the current standards of mathematical literature classification while "advanced algebra" also seems to convey a high school topic while "college algebra" seems to imply that you can't learn about the subject other than by going to college. Terminology is not consistent over the decades (currently I am formalizing Frege's 1879 work in a matter consistent with modern set theory), so it's possible I'm mistaken on current literature usage. I have no formal objection to the deletions/merge simply because I can think of no other useful super-category name consistent with common English usage.Dakleman (
talk) 13:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedians interested in clifford algebra
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:delete, very narrow topic, category is populated by one blocked editor. No need to merge, per nomination below.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:14, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedians interested in Lie algebra
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:upmerge, very narrow topic, category is populated by two editors, of whom one is blocked.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Offspring of Adam and Eve
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Why "offspring" instead of "children"? All are first-generation children, not grandchildren. This could be renamed to conform with other subcategories of
Category:Children by personGood Ol’factory(talk) 04:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support For some Christian groups, the current title would literally include every person on Earth.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 09:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Not just for "some Christian groups" as you write, but for all adherents of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. In any case, for this reason I support the proposal.
Debresser (
talk) 10:43, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
This interpretation would not match main article
offspring, which only covers first-generation descendants.
Dimadick (
talk) 15:49, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
If first generation children is the intended scope, this is as simple as
WP:C2C, consistency with established category tree names.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 10:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support - per the established naming norms in the offshoots pf
Category:Children by person. While the term "Offspring" technically is not incorrect for this category, the term "Children" is a more common term and will not cause as much confusion.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 11:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Best of Nollywood Awards winners
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 17:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Best of Nollywood Magazine is a Nigerian film and celebrity magazine that began hosting an annual award in 2009 called the
Best of Nollywood Awards. The articles in this category generally list this award in passing with other honors so it doesn't seem defining. (In contrast, the
Africa Movie Academy Awards is treated as a career capstone that is clearly defining.) The winners are already listified
here in individual list articles for any reader interested in this former award. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 00:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Background We deleted similar British and Indian film magazine awards
here and
here. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 00:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Merited Coaches of Belarus
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Per the spirit of
WP:C1, an unpopulated category and likely
WP:OCAWARD
We don't have an article on
Merited Coaches of Belarus. The only thing in this category is
Aleksandr Sevidov whose article doesn't even mention this award so it should be removed. I can't definitively say that this award is non-defining, but there is nothing in English Wikipedia that even hints it might be. There's nothing here to listify. -
RevelationDirect (
talk) 00:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, I am presuming that this was meant as an intersection between award winners and occupation, but that is not even clear, and if I am correct it is clearly undesirable as a trivial intersection.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
I have since found an article on
Honored Coach of Ukraine so I'm assuming it's a distinct award. If and when a main article is created, no objection to revisiting whether it's a defining category.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 09:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 12:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as above, non-defining.
GiantSnowman 12:57, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - per
WP:SMALLCAT,
WP:NONDEF, and
WP:OCAWARD. Only one entry in the category at the time of this edit, and that article barley mentions anything about this accomplishment.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 11:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Albany Thicket Biome
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Tom Radulovich, please refrain from manually renaming categories in the future and use the
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion process instead—this serves not only to provide others a brief opportunity to express any concerns but, more importantly, to ensure the move is performed correctly. Thanks in advance.
Support in principle per
WP:C2D but please note that copy and paste is highly undesirable because the history of the old page is then lost. I guess the closing administrator will first revert nom's actions and then properly have the category moved by admin tools.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 04:41, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Category has been emptied. LizRead!Talk! 13:51, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Once Upon a Time in China series
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:The Prophecy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.