The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 19:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Steve Dahl songs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 19:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 19:04, 22 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:SMALLCAT, meanwhile one more article has been added but on the other hand
Carson Desert belongs in a list rather than in this category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 03:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Mathematicians by ethnicity
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: per
WP:OCEGRS,
WP:NONDEFINING, and
WP:SMALLCAT. The one remaining subcategory of the top-level category,
Category:African-American mathematicians, is omitted from this proposal for two reasons: first, and more importantly, it is already under discussion, but second, I believe that it is qualitatively different, as an ethnic group of mathematicians that is notable as an intersection: there are multiple books about it, and a major national organization for it. In these other cases, that is not true. The subcategories of Arab mathematicians are nationalities (or in the case of "Medieval Arab mathematicians", a cultural milieu and one that is central to the history of mathematics) rather than ethnicities, so they can stay as national categories; I have not listed them. The ethnic sub-subcategories of Medieval Arab mathematicians can be considered separately; they're too different from the modern ethnic categories to be considered in the same CfD. Possibly
Category:Sri Lankan Tamil mathematicians should be upmerged to
Category:Sri Lankan mathematicians rather than simply deleted. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 17:21, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Indian legal films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:keep. bibliomaniac15 00:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Oppose unless sibling categories are nominated as well. It is not helpful to have the Indian category named differerently than in other countries.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 16:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Oppose per
Marcocapelle. The current title is consistent with all the other subcats of
Category:Legal films by country, and the nominator @
Kailash29792 offers no reason to treat India differently. Note that not all legal films are dramas, so I would oppose any proposal to rename the full set. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 20:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Oppose as a one-off, but would definitely recommend renaming the entire tree - unless someone points out what illegal films we have articles for on Wikipedia.
Grutness...wha? 04:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Railway stations located underground in Boston
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:no consensus. bibliomaniac15 03:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: All the contents of the parent category is in the immediate area of Boston, making categorization for Boston less relevant. The category still may have been necessary if oversized categories were an issue; however, upmerging this category would keep the parent at 31 pages.
147.161.12.52 (
talk) 08:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Mdaniels5757 (
talk) 15:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dashboard.wikiedu.org courses, New College of Floirda
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:keep. Because this is generated by wikiedu, it does not really seem to be in CFD's purview.
Ian (Wiki Ed), did you ever get to figure out what was up with this page? bibliomaniac15 03:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Marcocapelle, I have no idea who creates the pages in these categories. I just know that the pages get created on en.wp by some automated process and are overwritten by the version on on some other server (I forget which), so there is nothing we can do to change the category names. Moving the category page will just leave us with a non-empty redlinked category. --
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 08:36, 21 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Czechoslovak government-in-exile
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:keep. bibliomaniac15 00:54, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: per
WP:SMALLCAT. Contains only the head article
Czechoslovak government-in-exile plus one one biog:
Arnošt Frischer, who wasn't a member of the govt. Theoretically, the category could be populated with members of the Czechoslovak government-in-exile ...but the head article lists only two of them, which wouldn't make a viable category. No objection to re-creating the category if and when it can be populated with at least five actual members of the govt.
BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (
contribs) 11:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Frischer was a member of the legislative body of the government. We also have articles on their military forces (which I've added to the category) and other notable members of the government (
Edvard Benes, for instance) some of whom are listed in the article
Cabinet of the Czechoslovak government-in-exile, which I also added to the category. The solution was obviously populating the category, not deleting it. (
t ·
c) buidhe 11:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
keep and not rename. It now has its one subcat (not all RAF) and 11 articles
Hmains (
talk) 22:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
All additional articles are biographies so it does suggest creating
Category:Members of the Czechoslovak government-in-exile. The military units weren't all RAF but they were not under control of the government in exile either, the subcategory really does not belong here.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 03:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Marcocapelle, They were the de jure armed forces of the government in exile, even if de facto under other control. Dewiki has an article
de:Tschechoslowakische Exilarmee, which is completely supported by sourcing (for example
[1][2]). (
t ·
c) buidhe 05:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)reply
You are right, the British units of the Czechoslovak army were based on an agreement with the government in exile. Then, instead of renaming, create a subcategory for members of the government in exile.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep: The
WP:SMALLCAT argument makes no sense, since there is obvious possibility for the creation of more articles within it in the future. Plenty of potential officials, politicians, broadcasters, soldiers etc. who were associated to it. —Brigade Piron (
talk) 14:49, 14 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep -- This is now parenting two categories and three articles; and there is no obvious merge target. I think it is unkind to say that Czech forces in British pay during WWII were not forces of the exiled government. Even if they were in practice under British orders, three was probably a mechanism for referring to their own government if put upon.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 17:38, 19 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Czarniecki
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 11:11, 23 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: this is an eponymous category for the Polish
Czarniecki family, so if kept it should be renamed to match the head article. The title
Czarniecki is about the surname.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Captain America (1979 film series)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Beverly Hills Cop
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 18:55, 21 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Rename per nominator.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 11:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Bloodsport films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 18:55, 21 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: "Bloodsport" as a general term can refer to several sports, while this category is only for a specific film series.
★Trekker (
talk) 09:40, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Angel films
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 18:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: "Angel films" is very ambigious, could easily be confused with films about mythological angels.
★Trekker (
talk) 09:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Pokhara geography stubs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete category and stub. General agreement that {{Kaski-geo-stub}} is the better option. bibliomaniac15 03:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: What would be its parent category,
Category:Kaski district geography stubs is currently upmerged to
Category:Gandaki Pradesh geography stubs through {{
Kaski-geo-stub}} because it doesn't have enough articles to merit existence. So, this category is (probably) about a 100 years too early. Propose merging it to the existing (grand-)parent and deleting it. I have chosen "Merge" in Twinkle; what I mean is moving articles to the target and deleting it. Usedtobecool☎️ 08:49, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge, not enough articles in this stub category.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 12:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Oppose correct me if I'm wrong, but from my vantage point 11 entries is does not qualify as
WP:SMALLCAT or "not enough articles" as the above !voter states, unless there is a greater expectation for stub categories.
Inter&anthro (
talk) 21:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Inter&anthro: Maintenance categories have different requirements to other categories. Anything under 60 articles is regarded as too small for stubbing purposes. See
here.
Grutness...wha? 04:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Create
Category:Kaski district geography stubs and upmerge there. Both category and template (which itself is hardly needed yet) have been created without discussion, but together with {{Kaski-geo-stub}} there would be about 70 articles.
Grutness...wha? 04:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)reply
If this number is correct then this is by far the best solution.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 03:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Iron Eagle
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 18:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Rename per nominator.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 11:29, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Natural monuments of Slovenia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.
MER-C 11:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)reply
I agree that much of the tree should probably be CFDed, but a big CFD risks having complications (e.g. people oppose saying its a "trainwreck" rather than for substantive reasons) whilst some editors could still say that they'd prefer an even bigger CFD (e.g. including
Category:Cultural monuments of Slovenia etc). The
Natural monument article doesn't say much and doesn't say anything about Slovenia. DexDor(talk) 13:23, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Stick to Your Guns albums
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.
MER-C 18:56, 21 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Reply - I am open to a speedy retitle. --
Jax 0677 (
talk) 15:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.