The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment Why is this is the mass-murder category tree?
Purges involve removal of "undesirable" people for political or religious reasons. The targeted people may be imprisoned or exiled, without being killed. The purges in the
Soviet Union for example, typically involved sending the "undesirables" to the
Gulag (forced labor camp system). Purges are another form for
political repression.
Dimadick (
talk) 15:27, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:iOS (Apple)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename.
Timrollpickering 11:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: per main article,
iOS.
89.139.68.161 (
talk) 22:49, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment: note that
Category:iOS (lowercase i) is the same as
Category:IOS in terms of Wiki coding, so this should only go ahead if Apple iOS is very strongly the primary meaning of iOS or IOS. Note that there are several other meanings, see
IOS (disambiguation), although some of them would not normally be capitalised. –
FayenaticLondon 13:31, 14 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Songs written by Jedward
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: We do not do songwriters by band name - which is the marketing term used to sell records. Members of a band can change, but the songwriting credits do not. Here is a sample previous discussion which also refers to other
Discussions.
Richhoncho (
talk) 16:04, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
So why not move to the pair's names???
Johnbod (
talk) 04:11, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Johnbod:. Because neither person has an article and there is only one song written by either of them at present. --
Richhoncho (
talk) 09:24, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
As you've successfully argued in CfD before @
Richhoncho:, the writer(s) of a song is a defining characteristic even if the writer does not have an article. Is this a SMALLCAT argument then? Johnbod's suggestion below seems reasonable: use both names and split if they write notable songs independently. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:14, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep/rename If you want to delete as "small & unlikely to expand", say so, but that is a weak argument. They have a double biography as
Jedward, and deserve a songwriter category, either as a pair or using both names. It could be renamed if they split up. Specious nom.
Johnbod (
talk) 13:31, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: I would argue small cat if either a) there were a number of songs to be joined together, or, b) the songwriters had their own articles. If separated where would a searcher go, other than to the category? And no @
Johnbod: it is not a specious argument. --
Richhoncho (
talk) 20:03, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
You're talking about the exception to small categories, but
WP:SMALLCAT says to "avoid categories that, by their very definition, will never have more than a few members", which seems to be your argument here. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Not at all. My nomination is clear, the band name 'Jedward' is a marketing name, no more, no less (Example: Without mentioning marketing names who had no part in the creation of a song, how many of The Beatles were on the Beatle song, 'She's Leaving Home?'). If you think the two individual songwriters should be split into to categories, then do it, I will not be objecting, but I am still failing to find any WP advantage in any such action. --
Richhoncho (
talk) 23:20, 13 September 2018 (UTC)reply
No doubt both names redirect to Jedward, so that is where a searcher would go.
Johnbod (
talk) 03:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Jedward is the combination name used by the two brothers working together in music and and TV. A similar example might be
Category:Songs_written_by_Lennon–McCartney which exists for the works those men wrote together and the have separate categories for the works they wrote as individuals.
CallyMc (
talk) 11:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Romani people and Romanipen in Romania
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Merge.
Timrollpickering 14:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:Romanipen (a redirect to
Romani society and culture#Romanipen) is defined (in short) as Romani spirit, culture, law, being a Romani, a set of Romani strains. Therefore, these categories seem to serve exactly the same purpose and refer to exactly the same ethnic and cultural group. Note that
Category:Romanian Romani people (for individual people) is not affected by this nomination.
Place Clichy (
talk) 14:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge (possibly reverse merge). We do not need both.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 10:05, 14 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge (creator !vote) Note that back when this was created, 11 years ago, it looked like the category nomenclature was going to follow this pattern; someone decided against it, and created a secondary category, which has a more suitable name. S/he should've merged both back then.
Dahn (
talk) 06:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Metropolitan boroughs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Foster Farms Bowl
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename.
Timrollpickering 14:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: The game has been renamed to the San Francisco Bowl, no longer known as Foster Farms Bowl.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 12:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Support. As a matter of fact, why is a discussion even needed? You could have just been
bold, created the new San Francisco Bowl category yourself, and moved all the pages there.
Tom Danson (
talk) 15:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Tom Danson: I did that for the Cheez-It bowl category, but I wasn't sure if that was frowned upon. I will do that with the champion seasons subcategory.
PCN02WPS (
talk |
contribs) 19:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Free Linux distributions
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: "Free" is ambiguous as most Linux distributions are free of charge, there is only one subcategory:
Free software only Linux distributions and that being more specific, this category obviously isn't needed. - CHAMPION(
talk) (
contributions) (
logs) 08:56, 17 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ℯxplicit 04:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Support, a category only containing one subcategory is not useful for navigation.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 05:34, 27 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: With alternative below; those categories are now also tagged
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
FayenaticLondon 11:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:A.S.D. Nuova Cassino 1924 players
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename.
Timrollpickering 10:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People associated with the Lockheed bribery scandals
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete.
Timrollpickering 10:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:delete per
WP:OCASSOC. We usually categorize people based on conviction, not based on association. Possibly include the content of the category in a separate section of the
Lockheed bribery scandals article.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Principality of Galilee
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Keep.
Timrollpickering 14:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:merge per
WP:SMALLCAT, the category only contains the eponymous article, a redirect and a subcategory. A full upmerge to all parents is not needed, the content is already in appropriate other Crusader categories.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:20, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. The rest of the category (subcat
Princes of Galilee and article
Toron) can very well fit in [[:Category:Galilee}} and do not fit in other parent categories.
Place Clichy (
talk) 14:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - we have an article
Principality of Galilee and it is easily expandable as just done by myself to 7 articles. Can be doubled or tripled with a little more research and effort.
GreyShark (
dibra) 12:00, 12 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep -- There is now enough content to keep.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 10:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep -- There is now enough content to keep.
Laurel Lodged (
talk) 20:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Not a small category. A merge would also be misleading. The Principality included
Beirut and
Haifa, neither of which is included geographically in
Galilee.
Dimadick (
talk) 15:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Bethania, North Carolina
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Merge.
Timrollpickering 10:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Per
WP:SMALLCAT. Small one-county community with just two entries.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof? 00:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom The town is 3-centuries old, but never grew into a major settlement. It has a smaller population that several villages. It is unlikely we can populate this category with many articles.
Dimadick (
talk) 15:41, 17 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.