Category:Animated films nominated for Best Writing Academy Award
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.--
Mike Selinker (
talk) 21:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:Delete. My understanding is that we don't use categories for any of the Academy Award nominations, only for winners. (We don't even categorize films for being
nominated for Best Picture.) This category is somewhat odd because it combines two separate awards (Best Original Screenplay and Best Adapted Screenplay) and is applied only to animated films that were nominated for either.
Good Ol’factory(talk) 23:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete Per nom, yes we don't cat films by the awards they are nominated for. Lugnuts (
talk) 07:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete I'm inclined to keep more awards categories than most editors but even I can't stomach just being nominated.
RevelationDirect (
talk) 14:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Members of the 1813 Assembly
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.--
Mike Selinker (
talk) 21:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale:Rename. Suggest renaming to match main article
Asamblea del Año XIII. The standard for categories for members of legislative bodies is "Members of XXX", where XXX is the WP article name of the legislative body.
Good Ol’factory(talk) 22:59, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
College basketball categories
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename per nom.
Ruslik_
Zero 17:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Propose rename all. It is the standard naming convention in college sports, specifically WikiProject College Basketball, that when a school's men's and women's basketball programs use different nicknames, the gender-identifier portion of the category title gets dropped due to redundancy. That's why there is
Category:Old Dominion Monarchs basketball players versus
Category:Old Dominion Lady Monarchs basketball players. I had tried to speedily rename these, but someone
didn't want to hear it and I was forced to bring these to a full CfD.
Jrcla2 (
talk) 19:34, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Rename per nom. Would match existing convention.
Rikster2 (
talk) 21:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Rename. Well established category convention.--
Mike Selinker (
talk) 22:44, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Estradiols
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support. Yes, moving that into Steriods would make sense. --
Tryptofish (
talk) 22:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Estranes
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge.--
Mike Selinker (
talk) 21:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Propose upmerge of
Category:Estranes into
Category:Steroids. Only one entry and one sub-category I proposed for deletion (above). Could be populated, but
Category:Steroids has only 155 pages (excluding sub-cats) so I see no need to do so. --
ἀνυπόδητος (
talk) 13:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Many steroids are estranes, and I don't see anything special or useful about collecting those that are (the main article for this cat is about the parent structure itself and is a stub that doesn't look like it would even survive AFD, nothing really about the class of compounds other than that the parent structure is the parent structure of them.
DMacks (
talk) 16:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Support. Yes, I agree with that. If anything, there is even less of a need for this one than for Estradiols. --
Tryptofish (
talk) 22:30, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Queanbeyan, New South Wales
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.--
Mike Selinker (
talk) 21:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: There is no need for disambiguation as this is a unique name. The main article is at
Queanbeyan and the parent category is at
Category:Queanbeyan.
Mattinbgn (
talk) 09:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Region of Peel
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename per nom.
Ruslik_
Zero 17:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Nominator's rationale: Per main article. Some subcats. may need to be renamed, too if this passes. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯ 04:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment I won't presume to offer an opinion but I will note the existence of
Peel (Western Australia), also called Peel region. --
Mattinbgn (
talk) 09:17, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Checker Records releases
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Basins of Switzerland
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename.--
Mike Selinker (
talk) 21:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Feel free to nominate others as appropriate.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 19:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Uncategorised songs
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. For reasons stated in
this CFD, I don't see how someone coming across an uncategorized song would categorize it here rather than a more appropriate category.
Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (
talk) 01:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Support This makes sense to me. —
Justin (koavf)❤
T☮
C☺
M☯ 04:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and previous consensus. Lugnuts (
talk) 07:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Though I like the irony of this category.
Resolute 17:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.