The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 12:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a category for graduates of Clarion Workshop, "a six-week workshop for new and aspiring science fiction and fantasy writers". A category for graduates seems a bit much for a six-week workshop, however notable it is. If we have this, we might as well have a category for people with MCSE certifications, pilot's licences, etc. Saforrest 23:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Syrthiss 12:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
We have both sexes combined for some historical reason. This would be a big change that would have to take place for all nationalities... this may be the place to decide that... but, I think we've mostly agreed on it being actors for both male and female. gren グレン 23:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn by nominator. -- William Allen Simpson 18:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC) reply
At least one of the invasions included in this category, the Roman invasion, happened long before there was an "England"; this is arguably also true of the Anglo-Saxon invasion, since "England" was a result of that invasion. Since it is most natural to include these invasions all in a single category, I propose renaming the category to Category:Invasions of Britain. -- Saforrest 23:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 12:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
All the reasons mentioned in the next nomination down apply and this is also too small and overprecise. The 3 articles are in category:Aquaria in Canada and Category:Visitor attractions in British Columbia. Choalbaton 21:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Syrthiss 12:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Zoos and category:Aquaria are separate and none of the other national categories are combined in this way. This category is also miscapitalised. I have moved the aquaria to Category:Aquaria in Canada, and I have no strong opinions on whether or not that should be a subcategory of Category:Zoos in Canada, but either way this would best be merged into category:Zoos in Canada. Choalbaton 21:02, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Syrthiss 12:24, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a category that should be a list (and already is at Oprah's Book Club. MakeRocketGoNow 20:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 12:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Standard plural form and useful suggestions from Valiantis on the talk page here [1]. Tim! 20:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 12:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
As above for Ombudsman/Ombudsmen Tim! 20:41, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 12:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Another non-standard plural per above. — Apr. 18, '06 [01:20] < freakofnurxture | talk>
The result of the debate was LGBaleeTe!. Syrthiss 12:27, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Needs to be renamed to a proper pluralization and populated with articles, or deleted, but can't be left as is. I lack sufficient familiarity with the topic to know whether the former is feasible. — Apr. 18, '06 [01:20] < freakofnurxture | talk>
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 12:28, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Needs to be renamed to a proper pluralization and populated with articles, or deleted, but can't be left as is. I lack sufficient familiarity with the topic to know whether the former is feasible. — Apr. 18, '06 [01:25] < freakofnurxture | talk>
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 12:28, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Needs to be renamed to a proper pluralization, and populated with articles, or deleted, but can't be left as is. I lack sufficient familiarity with the topic to know whether the former is feasible. Also, the "O" probably should not be capitalized, unless the title in its plural form is the name of an organization, which does not seem likely. — Apr. 18, '06 [01:29] < freakofnurxture | talk>
The result of the debate was rename (and hopefully populate). Syrthiss 12:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Needs to be renamed to a proper pluralization and populated with articles, or deleted, but can't be left as is. I lack sufficient familiarity with the topic to know whether the former is feasible. — Apr. 18, '06 [01:29] < freakofnurxture | talk>
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 12:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Appears to be a duplicate of the previous entry, could probably be speedy deleted as such. — Apr. 18, '06 [01:29] < freakofnurxture | talk>
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 12:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
There are no Russian duchesses but there are Russian grand duchesses. All had been previously removed from this category as it was inaccurate and other categories better describe the women it was used for. Charles 20:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. Syrthiss 12:32, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
CAZA is the Canadian Association of Zoos and Aquariums. The members seem to be all the reputable zoos and acquairiums in Canada, and the category is thus pretty pointless. Merge into category:Zoos in Canada. Choalbaton 20:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was deletions that change lives. Syrthiss 12:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Grouping colleges and universities because they were covered in the same book does not make for a useful categorization scheme. - EurekaLott 20:15, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 12:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Incompletely implemented subcategory of Category:Sports venues by city, which is still small enough not to require country-level subcategories. The one category it includes is duplicated in the parent category. - EurekaLott 20:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep, but populate or I'm going to come through in a month and whack it. Syrthiss 12:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Currently empty category with minimal possibilities for growth. How many notable Thai Americans are there, really? Tiger Woods doesn't count. Microtonal 18:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated. Syrthiss 12:37, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
First: America != United States. Secondly: Avoid adjective and use nouns when dealing with countries. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC) support Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:27, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Vegaswikian 19:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 12:38, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
This is the form used for the other subcategories and unless there is a strong local convention to the contrary of the proposed form renaming seems to be a straightforward matter of applying general principles. CalJW 13:02, 17 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 12:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
A follow up to the two nominations below. "Mormonism" sounds more neutral and the main category is Category:Mormonism. Rename Bhoeble 10:59, 17 April 2006 (UTC). reply
Do Not Rename Mormonism has splintered since its founding. It now includes the official LDS church as well as small splinter groups, some of which adhere to the original precepts of their prophets. LDS understandably wants to distant itself from its early history, but their political spin should not get a historical stamp of approval. Mormonism is a broad term like christianity or Islam, under which many groups operate. Sqrjn 00:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to History books about the Latter Day Saint movement. Syrthiss 12:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Similar to the nomination below. Some of these books are critical so the possessive is misleading. Mormonism is more familiar in everyday English and sounds more neutral. The top category is category:Mormonism. Rename category:History books about Mormonism Bhoeble 10:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename to HotLDSm. Syrthiss 12:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
For a start the capitalisation is wrong. More importantly, as the blurb says, some of these historians are critics of the religion, not adherents of it. Finally "Mormonism" is both more familiar and more neutral sounding than "Latter Day Saint" and the main category is Category:Mormonism. Rename Category:Historians of Mormonism Bhoeble 10:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was already deleted. - TexasAndroid 18:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
accidentally made double.
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 12:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
"Sports venues" is more flexible than "Stadiums" as it includes indoor arenas, racetracks, golf courses and so on. There are only a couple of stadiums in Paris proper but there are several other sports venues. The sports-related parent categories are Category:Sports venues in France and Category:Sports venues by city. Rename Choalbaton 09:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 12:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
redundant - we have Category:Antipodes Islands which better fits usual naming. Grutness... wha? 06:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 12:47, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Renomination of invalidly closed nomination. ("category not tagged"? Please.) Actors lumped together because they've been in different versions of War of the Worlds, including films, TV series or the Jeff Wayne album. Pointlessly arbitrary connection. Calton | Talk 06:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 12:47, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
This was tagged for renaming last year but nothing was done. Rename as per convention for Category:Golf clubs and courses. ReeseM 04:26, 17 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was merge. Syrthiss 12:48, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
{{
editprotected}}
Cfm: The target category is more general - all these templates are protected, so I cant't simply do it. -- Omniplex 03:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated. Syrthiss 12:50, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Want to use a consistent name with Category:NASCAR drivers, Category:American Speed Association drivers, Category:World of Outlaws drivers, etc. Royalbroil 02:44, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy merge. Syrthiss 12:50, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The category was created by a relative newcomer who didn't understand the naming conventions that we (at WikiProject NASCAR) are using for lists of drivers (like Category:NASCAR drivers and Category:ARCA racers). We need to keep this category consistent with these similiar categories. I moved all the drivers into the new category before I got to this point. Sorry about that. The new list (with the lower case d) will have more drivers added soon. Royalbroil 02:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was not so speedy rename. Syrthiss 12:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The amended form will match the other six categories in category:Nature reserves. ReeseM 02:05, 17 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 12:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
slightly more comprehensive, and specific (e.g. includes Category:Rocks on Mars. Mlm42 01:38, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 12:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Avoid acronym; better capitalisation; all relevant articles are in this form e.g. Ulster Unionist Party leadership election, 2005. Timrollpickering 00:30, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply