The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 06:39, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Distinctly POV category; not capable of being used objectively, and not useful since decision of pages that would be included in this category would only be POV. NicholasTurnbull 23:19, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 03:57, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty. Punjab is divided between India and Pakistan. category:Cities and towns of Punjab, India exists. I expect a similar subcategory will be created in category:Punjab, Pakistan sometime soon. Delete. CalJW 22:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge then delete to Category:Punjab, India. ∞ Who ?¿? 04:00, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Duplicate. Merge into Category:Punjab, India and delete. CalJW 22:50, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep as Category Redirect. ∞ Who ?¿? 04:02, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category, redundant to Category:Municipalities in Spain. -- BD2412 talk 20:34, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete, previously speedy [ [1]]. ∞ Who ?¿? 04:04, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
This should be merged into category:Pakistani actors and then deleted. CalJW 16:15, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 04:05, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
This contained one article, which I have moved to category:Ethnic groups of India. I have no strong feelings on the matter, but Ethnic groups is clearly preferred in Wikipedia. CalJW 15:28, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 04:06, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Only member is Jennifer Wilbanks, and only parent is a redlink, Category:Truth. Samaritan 15:19, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename to Category:Buildings and structures in Pakistan
Should be category:Buildings and structures in Pakistan. This is in line with the majority of such categories and a policy decision that was made at some point. It removes doubt that things like the dam I am about to place in the category belong there. CalJW 15:03, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep. ∞ Who ?¿? 06:31, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
This category is part of the series Category:English people by county. The County of London was replaced in 1965 with the somewhat larger Greater London. Category should be changed to reflect this. Mrsteviec 11:34, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply
As this is clearly contentious perhaps removing the category from Category:English people by county would be the best option. As those above have pointed out London is taken in this context to be a city. Could Category:English people by city be the place for this or somewhere else? Mrsteviec 17:37, 4 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename to Category:Fashion albums. ∞ Who ?¿? 04:16, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Category:Fashion albums. There is no need to specify that it is a band if you are listing their albums. -- Reinyday, 10:05, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 05:03, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Only has one article. Seems like a poor categorization scheme to lump all television episodes in one category. May be somewhat already covered by Category:Lists of television series episodes MakeRocketGoNow 03:47, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was No consensus (no change). ∞ Who ?¿? 05:05, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Such an esoteric topic that it has little potential for growth. -- Apostrophe 00:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename to Category:Lincoln automobiles; see below notes. ∞ Who ?¿? 05:46, 10 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Lincoln is primarily a city in England. That should be reserved for things like Lincoln Cathedral, not cars. Dunc| ☺ 02:10, 3 September 2005 (UTC) reply