The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 13:05, 27 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Correction as per naming conventions (ie. "UK", capitalization of both words in "Radio Stations"). Bearcat 22:35, 20 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:09, 27 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Please delete this category. Its content have been moved to Category:Numerical software.-- Fredrik Orderud 20:30, 20 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:11, 27 May 2005 (UTC) reply
From Category talk:Logic:
The problems with the category are:
Hence I think we would be better off without such a category.
See also the previous failed CfD Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 May 12#Category:Formal logic, which was opposed by User:Isaac Rabinovitch, who now supports this CfD on the grounds of the difficulties the category puts on classification. Since we now appear to have a consensus to delete, I am relisting this category. --- Charles Stewart 19:24, 20 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:17, 27 May 2005 (UTC) reply
There is no year 0. These categories can never possibly be populated. The explanation given on Category:0's page is that the birth year and death year templates create links to these categories. As far as I'm concerned, any one of the following alternatives is preferable to creating categories for non-existant years:
So ... Delete. -- Azkar 18:29, 20 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete Category:00s deaths -- Kbdank71 13:39, 27 May 2005 (UTC) reply
They are of the same period. Which one should be removed and which one should be retained? -- Hello World! 15:01, 20 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:40, 27 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Deprecated and empty (the more inclusive Category:European nobility stubs is now used instead). Grutness... wha? 10:36, 20 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep -- Azkar 18:15, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The subcats (i.e. old elections archive) seem useful. But what about the main cat? Many old pages in the Wiki get tagged with Template:historical which puts them in here, which means that this will eventually become a list of the entire Wikipedia namespace except pages recently edited. Is there any point in that? R adiant _* 10:17, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
In the interests of clearing off this discussion, I'm going to try and summarize things as I understand them, and offer a resolution.
I propose the following:
If no one objects to this, I'll execute sometime tomorrow. -- Azkar 18:22, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 14:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Since Category:Terrorist organizations was recently deleted (after a lengthy debate), should these then be deleted or renamed per the same reasoning? R adiant _* 07:43, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
Jcuk 21:14, 29 May 2005 (UTC) reply
GCarty 09:11, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply