- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Kudos to Cullen328 for article improvement. The Bushranger One ping only 23:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Zoo Art Fair
- Zoo Art Fair ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks not notable. Poor article, unreferenced, created and contributed to be SPA editors. Info outdated (defunct since 2009). Would appreciate the input from editors with an interest in art about notability. Rayman60 ( talk) 23:30, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No attempt made to meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria including WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. Looking at RS this article is totally fixable. C'est la vie. -- MurderByDeletionism "bang!" 00:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. I think it is salvageable, but someone needs to put in the work to fix it. How about you, MurderByDeadcopy? Deb ( talk) 10:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- I tried that once on an article in AfD where I recognized the subject and was aggressively attacked for the attempt so no, I refuse to go through that torture again! -- MurderByDeletionism "bang!" 17:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 11:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 17:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk 17:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep A Google News search shows quite a bit of coverage, including a mention in the New York Times which helps explain why it closed . The fact that the event is no longer held should have no impact on this debate. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:05, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I have added new content and references to coverage in three independent, reliable sources to the article. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as it now stands the article passes GNG and WP:EVENT. The coverage in Contemporary British Art: An Introduction while short places it in context within the British art scene. Jbh Talk 15:33, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, thanks to Cullen328's good work. Drmies ( talk) 22:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.