The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Zoey 101 episodes. Salvio 10:36, 18 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Zoey 101: Goodbye Zoey?

Zoey 101: Goodbye Zoey? (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While I was looking at the article for the iCarly series finale, I ended up taking a deep dive and saw this article about this episode of Zoey 101 that premiered two weeks after the news about Jamie Lynn Spears’ teen pregnancy broke. It may have gotten attention with the ratings, but there does not appear to be anything else that would source this apart from fan wikis on Fandom. I’m thinking, should this article were to avoid deletion, a redirect to the episode's summary in the list of Zoey 101 episodes to go by this Wikipedia talk from 2017. Pahiy ( talk) 21:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Pahiy ( talk) 21:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Pahiy ( talk) 21:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC) reply

• Weak redirect to List of Zoey 101 episodes. Sourcing consists of a rottentomatoes entry with no critic reviews, a ranker entry, a BuddyTV article which is meh, a tv.com entry that has no analysis, broadcasting cable article that I cannot access, a tv guide that's only plot summary, and a bunch of articles about Spears' pregnancy that aren't about the episode. The MediaLife and BuddyTV sources are the best, but buddytv doesn't strike me as particularly reliable and MediaLife is mostly about the finale's viewership, content that can easily be covered in the main article and in fact is already briefly mentioned. Admittedly this article isn't as clear cut to me as the others, but there still isn't enough for a stand alone article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:25, 10 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.