Delete Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGSIG. The sources are almost entirely PR-based or non-independent. No actual in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources, just press releases and blog posts.
Wikilover3509 (
talk) 14:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Company actually seems notable to me, even though the article is terrible.
This already can help for an introduction, and a section on their practices.
Here is a case study, whose facts we can assume to be reliable.
This is obviously not acceptable, yet its promotional claims indicate that the company is likely notable.
Drmies (
talk) 14:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment: It would be worth considering the present article about this subsidiary company in the wider context of articles on the parent company
Zamil Industrial (created around the same time by the same editor) and
Zamil Group Holding (created more recently). Do each have sufficient specific notability to justify multiple article here?
AllyD (
talk) 07:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
StarMississippi 16:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Note: I have fixed spacing in the header that broke some of the links, but have no opinion or further comment at this time. WCQuidditch☎✎ 10:55, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
DoczillaOhhhhhh, no! 19:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)reply