The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I'm unable to understand the opinion by GreenCricket, and the other "weak keep" opinion doesn't actually make an argument. Sandstein 18:04, 2 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:NACTOR and
WP:GNG, unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent and do not cover him becoming a Dad
JMHamo (
talk) 15:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. Once he will have had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions he will qualify for an encyclopaedic article per
WP:NACTOR. Until then, not a single word in the article is suggestive of his
WP:SIGNIFICANCE and the article should be deleted under
WP:CSD#A7.
kashmiriTALK 15:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Strongly Keep He is significant figure and has a side info in google, he is notable for google but its wiki link is linked to Pakistani ODI cricketer which must be replaced by Zahid Ahmed (actor) so i suggest to keep it
GreenCricket (
talk) 11:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)reply
I am unable to replicate side info in Google which only returns 212 hits on "zahid ahmed" actor.
[1] Can you link it please? There is a side info for Zahid Ahmad the cricketer, it might have some incorrectly matched images.
kashmiriTALK 12:36, 12 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete unless anyone has better Pakistani coverage as I'm not seeing anything to suggest even minimal solid notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 03:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 18:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Side-info on google is for Zahid Ahmed Actor not for cricketer..It is mistakenly linked to article of a cricketer because there was no article on wiki for Actor Zahid Ahmed...How can you imagine a side-info for a cricketer who has played two ODIs for Pakistan only and even he is not a Test cricketer?
GreenCricket (
talk) 14:19, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Side info on Google is always for the search term, and it returns the cricketer's personal data along with photos randomly of the cricketer and the actor (as this is how Google algorythm works). But - BUT - Google results are completely irrelevant to a person's notability for Wikipedia - see
WP:GOOGLEHITS.
kashmiriTALK 23:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 20:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. Non notable.
Soulseek324 (
talk) 22:57, 26 December 2015 (UTC) struck !vote of a sockpuppet - they edited a number of AfD pages in addition to the one the sockpuppetry concerned, aparrently in a bid to make the sockpuppetry less conspicuous. See
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TurquoisesummerRichardOSmith (
talk) 08:10, 28 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.