The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Vanity page. Non notable individual. Many passing notices, current news (non encyclopediac), youtube ,and blog sources.
NegroLeagueHistorian (
talk) 01:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Isn't all the media coverage (including things that date back to the 90s) in fact evidence of his notability? Forget the A-Rod ball; he had already been interviewed on national network TV programs, had newspaper articles written about him, and authored 3 books. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.187.134.101 (
talk) 16:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep - The article does need a slight rewrite in some areas, but the individual is clearly notable. What do you mean by vanity? An actual reason may make an actual argument, but I don't see one. The person set records, is nationally covered, and an interesting subject of sports fans. Clearly needs to stay, confused as to why it was nominated.
TheGracefulSlick (
talk) 17:08, 21 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Also Speedy Keep. He's been noteworthy for a while - received significant coverage after his back-to-back homer snags, game show appearance, three books - A-Rod snag/keep has just resulted in controversy. Controversy be eschewed, there's no need for his page to be whacked.
DNOMN8R3.14 (
talk) 19:07, 21 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep clearly enough coverage.--
Yankees10 02:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep Like him and his antics or not, he's gotten enough coverage for GNG. Some cleanup is needed. –
Muboshgu (
talk) 17:04, 22 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep The guy has been relevant in baseball for quite awhile; his books on baseball (one specifically) are published and have been fairly well-read; his accomplishments are very unique and surprisingly important in the baseball world. His recent newsworthy catch and reaction only make me think more that he deserves an article. Metsfreak(Hello!) 02:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep. Although the article does need some cleanup - for instance I just removed these links:
Keep. This man has published three books about baseball, and been interviewed by various news media, which make him undoubtedly notable.--
RekishiEJ (
talk) 13:39, 26 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.