The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Apparently not notable by our standards, does not meet
WP:ARTIST, some shows in some fairly minor galleries, the routine business of a working artist. Sourcing is tenuous in the extreme. I started removed some of the worst (e.g., Houzz: "With Houzz, professionals can showcase their work and provide insight into their values") but stopped when I realised that there's essentially nothing there. Article creator is blocked as an undisclosed paid editor, and there seems to be every likelihood that this is in fact a paid advertisement (and, lest we forget,
Wikipedia does not tolerate advertisements).
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk) 12:05, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete.Looks like a cv or promotion. The article is tagged with paid, it is hard to tell how it came about but it certainly doesn't appear an organic article. 30+ refs, I checked about half a dozen at random and they mean nothing, the others look the same but weren't checked.
Szzuk (
talk) 19:49, 28 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete went through all the sources, and also did a search for other sources. There were articles that talk about her, but they took forever to find and were blogs. Doesn't meet
WP:ARTIST.
SportingFlyer (
talk) 03:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete sourcing is not strong enough to support notability, and is of very low quality.
104.163.148.25 (
talk) 04:02, 1 March 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.