The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Moved to Draft by creating editor‎. This is a procedural speedy close based upon the originator's move of the article to Draft during the process. That was one of the likely outcomes, so this discussion has become unnecessary (non-admin closure) 🇺🇦  Fiddle^Timtrent  Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:36, 21 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Yusif Meizongo Jnr

Yusif Meizongo Jnr (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification. Since it is likely that the subject has notability I recommend Draftify as the outcome of this discussion. The references consist of interviews with the subject, some with commentary, and gossip column-like material, coupled with apparent churnalism. Not ready for mainspace. 🇺🇦  Fiddle^Timtrent  Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Ghana. 🇺🇦  Fiddle^Timtrent  Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete, doesn't cite a single source that would meet the GNG standard, as they're all churnalism, press releases, and/or non-RS. I could also live with draftification if the creator agrees not to publish again past AfC, but only as long as there's some confidence that appropriate sources can be found (and I must say I had a quick look and found none, so not very optimistic). -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 08:14, 21 October 2023 (UTC) reply
• Draftify Disputed draftification indeed. my rationale is exactly nominator's rationale. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 08:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete no serious independent coverage in WP:RS.- KH-1 ( talk) 09:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.