- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Yulem
- Yulem ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems made up. Insubstantial sourcing. Bus stop ( talk) 08:46, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 April 29. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 09:10, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 10:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no trace of this word in WP:RS online, and article is mainly sourced by blog posts with author name matching the account of the creator of this article. So it's either a joke, a hoax, a failed meme experiment, or a non-notable neologism per WP:NEO. Either way, it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. The Mighty Glen ( talk) 10:59, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per The Mighty Glen. There appears to be a COI issue as well. Johnbod ( talk) 12:34, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.