- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:47, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Yo Vizag
- Yo Vizag ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not even sure where to begin with this as there's nothing acceptable to revert to and it's a hot mess of promotional content. I also can't find any independent sources that talk about the magazine. I'm nominating this with some explosive devices as it needs to be nuked from orbit and rewritten if rs can be found. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:54, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 11:54, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Because of how the article was organised, all I could think of is its content written like an advertisement. If only there were more strong sources to support its notability, I would have voted otherwise. Overall, I believe it didn't comply with WP:GNG. Romrom9 ( talk) 09:11, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.