The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus.
Daniel (
talk) 23:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)reply
KEEP There are sufficient independent references to establish
WP:SIGCOV.--
Steamboat2020 (
talk) 22:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Appears to meet
WP:SIGCOV from the sources in the article.
4meter4 (
talk) 16:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk) 17:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Would be nice to hear what these sources actually are.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
Joe (
talk) 18:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.