The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. And I hope these valuable sources find their way into the article. I didn't follow the suggestion to Merge this article but as far as I can see in the comments, the Merge target doesn't exist yet. LizRead!Talk! 07:34, 15 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails
WP:NBUILD. Possible redirect to whatever body of water it connects to.... which isn't even noted in the article. -
UtherSRG(talk) 16:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment. As one might expect, there is a longer article on this topic in the Persian Wikipedia at
fa: نیروگاههای زنجیرهای یاسوج with lots of references. It should be possible to expand the article with text taken from the Persian article. Eastmain (
talk •
contribs) 16:48, 6 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Complex/Rational 18:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment I don't want to straight up !vote keep since I haven't personally reviewed or searched for non-English sources, but power plants almost always will receive a level of coverage, and it seems probable it can be sourced using sources in the local language.
SportingFlyerT·C 21:03, 13 July 2023 (UTC)reply
I think these are small plants but nevertheless interesting. Our article says this chain of run-of-river is near
Sisakht. If you look at the Google Maps
satellite view, this is a hilly, arid location with some big creeks (or small rivers) and small canals. On those streams, you'll see some of these structures. What's harder to find is the refs that I know should be out there. --A. B.(
talk •
contribs •
global count) 22:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep - Google translation of our Farsi (Persian)
article
Keep per A. B. See also
this in-depth study of the nine-station hydropower system. That said, it might be ideal to cover this in an article on the river (or move this to become an article on the river), a sub-sub-sub-tributary of the Kasun that doesn't seem to have a standard transliteration but is given in that article as
Polkolo River. --
Visviva (
talk) 04:43, 15 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Note to admin: I'm happy with
Visviva's idea re: merging to an article on the river. As a general rule, instead of 6.5 million articles, I'd like to see all that information in fewer but bigger articles - easier to manage.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.