From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 18:43, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Yakir Gabay

Yakir Gabay (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is basically a promotional company profile for this guy's various real estate deals. I see nary a source that deals with him as a person, instead lots of share price bulletins and portfolio blurbs. He is not a sufficiently covered subject. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 11:26, 28 October 2018 (UTC) Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 11:26, 28 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Hi, Am I in the right place? can we discuss the nomination to deletion of this article here?

I would like to state that its not promotional, i have put some effort to put this text together and honestly it not always easy to write over certain subjects and keep it neutral. So, I took your comments and went over the article, deleted some sentences, numbers and tried to stick to the facts. There is not much information on this person, I would be very happy if you can go over it and reconsider, I will edit even more in the next 1-2 days. Thanks, Hilit.schenkel ( talk) 19:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Hilit.schenkel, if "there is not much information on this person" then that argues against having an article on them. There needs to exist a critical mass of coverage of a subject before an article can be written; if that coverage doesn't exist, then no amount of additional decorations will make it suitable. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 09:05, 30 October 2018 (UTC) reply

As I wrote before, I have added more references ( third party ones) since your comment and I have deleted some of the text. Writing that there is not much information on this person, was related to his personal life, not his career. His Career and business strategy has solid coverage and sources on the net and its appears in the article. Hilit.schenkel ( talk) 18:04, 30 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep -- Per above comments. The sourcing now in the article establishes GNG beyond any doubt. The nom obviously only looked at the sources in the article at the time of nomination when a trivial search in GNews would have revealed the many, many RS about this guy. Yet another failure of WP:BEFORE. 192.160.216.52 ( talk) 19:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.