- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 00:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Yaesu FT-60
- Yaesu FT-60 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am nominating this page for deletion because I don't think the subject is really very notable. The page just reads a bit like a product brochure and adds little of historical value, even for ham radio enthusiasts (a minority of the population themselves). I noticed this page a couple of days ago, but then also today the deletion of the Yaesu FT-990 page ( Mikeblas— Mark_viking— Eggishorn) - this page seems in the exact same category. I think this is only the second time I've nominated a page for deletion, so I hope I've done everything right. Stroller ( talk) 16:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like a good nomination to me. Like the other recently-deleted articles, there is no source that establishes notability beyond mere existence. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:32, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a notable product. -- Mikeblas ( talk) 02:12, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 08:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.