The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) b uidh e 23:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC) reply

X Ray: The Inner Image

X Ray: The Inner Image (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason North8000 ( talk) 18:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

As posted at the article talk page. Review under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process.

Thanks for your work on this article. As a part of Wikipedia's new article review / curation process I just reviewed the article.

In my opinion, this topic, to the extent visible in the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines which is a requirement for existence of a separate article on topic. This guideline is described at WP:Notability and in the specialized guidelines linked at the beginning of that page which provide somewhat of an alternate. The core element of wp:notability is that there are some independent published sources which covered the topic of the article in depth. Of the 6 references given, 3 are to the press release for the trailer, verbatim, one is discussing the press release for the trailer, one is to the trailer itself, and one is to posters for the movie.

I have nominated the article for deletion so that the community may decide. North8000 ( talk) 18:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep as since its release it has received full, independent reviews in national newspapers such as Times of India here and Deccan Herald [1] here, and MidDay here, therefore passing WP:NFILM criteria 1 which indicates a pass of WP:GNG, imv Atlantic306 ( talk) 00:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.