The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails
WP:GNG. No reliable and independent sources, no significant work.
Zafir94 (
talk) 02:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment. To make it clear: Despite there is some coverage in Google News, and the organization is stated to be recognized by GAISF and IOC, the way the article is currently written (sourced) makes it fail
WP:GNG. No reliable third party independent sources in place as required.
Zafir94 (
talk) 07:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Essentially the pre-eminent governing body in kickboxing and the organization recognized for kickboxing by the olympic folks. Refs could use improvement, sure. Perhaps we can tag the article for that instead of proposing deletion?
Shadess (
talk) 20:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)reply
I just added many references, the article looks better now.
Lethweimaster (
talk) 22:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Reconsider nomination after additions to the article nominated. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 05:15, 8 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The consensus was clear: out of 3 entries, 1 strong keep and 2 keep.
Lethweimaster (
talk) 14:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)reply
AfD closures are not strictly a vote-counting process but thank you for your comment. LizRead!Talk! 16:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.