The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I think the article deserve a separate article since it is more focussed on tourism campaign, and yes it still need expansion and elaboration. The slogan Wonderful Indonesia, and its history and campaign has somewhat knowledge value on marketing, branding, and tourism study. If we use your proposed approach — every tourism campaign articles should be deleted or merged to other tourism-related article — then the whole
Category:Tourism campaigns should be deleted altogether or merged, that include other tourism campaigns such as
Incredible India that should be deleted too.Gunkartatalk 13:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Redirect to
Tourism in Indonesia - A slogan is a slogan, and usually they aren't notable, unless there's coverage about the slogan itself, which seems to be lacking. This is no Amazing Thailand or Malaysia, Truly Asia.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 02:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)reply
I've expanded and elaborate on the coverage about the slogan itself and also the campaign, in new section "appreciation and criticism". Yes there is no Amazing Thailand or Malaysia, Truly Asia article (yet), but there are articles such as
Incredible India and
Pilipinas Kay Ganda.Gunkartatalk 09:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
NorthAmerica1000 15:21, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Redirect per Narutolovehinata5. I think there's a source or two that can warrant a couple of sentences in the
Tourism in Indonesia article, but the campaign itself doesn't register as notable from the sources in the article. Only two of the sources actually are ABOUT this "Wonderful Indonesia" campaign, with one about the launch and another about some criticism.
GRUcrule (
talk) 16:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.