The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC) reply
No secondary sources to demonstrate notability. Looks like an advert. TrulyBlue ( talk) 18:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC) reply
I've still seen no evidence that this article is anything more than spam directly from the makers of the software. Since the software is known to be advertised through e-mail spam, I think the article needs to have more reputable sources and more objectivity to remain in Wikipedia. Rostovpack ( talk) 22:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC) reply