From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Moved. Per consensus ( non-admin closure) Nördic Nightfury 12:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Wing Chun terms

Wing Chun terms (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Textbook WP:NOT#DICTIONARY, #2 / pure WP:OR - failed prod because it's "nice" Toddst1 ( talk) 16:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:38, 12 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Well this isn't OR - there are plenty of Wing Chun glossaries out there. [1] As Wing Chun is a widely practiced form of martial arts, glossaries published by masters and clubs about the art itself should be considered independent reliable sources. "Not dictionary" does not apply here, because that policy relates to articles which comprise a dictionary definition of a single term, not to glossaries. The English Wikipedia has plenty of specialist glossaries, such as the others linked from {{ Glossaries of sports}}. Deryck C. 15:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh ( talk) 01:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.