The result was keep. merge can be done without a finding here Spartaz Humbug! 03:30, 13 January 2010 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Unnotable "code name" for Windows XP with no significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Attempts to properly redirect to Development of Windows XP are continually being reverted over the last few months by several SPA accounts and IPs, with a "source" to a self-published website given as support for its report. ANI report on the users has already been filed, but deletion seems the best bet as there is no actual significant coverage or use of this term to refer to anything other than someone's similarly named shareware application. Previous AfD closed with no consensus, where it was noted that nothing in the article could be verified, failing WP:V, which continues to remain true (personal sites can not verify anything). Looking at the arguments, in which there appears to be some socking/meating going on, it seems as those more supported deletion or merging than keeping it as it. As some editors continue to accept the merge, however, it seems another discussion to determine true consensus is needed. Due to the heavy IP socking occurring on the article over the last several months, heavy admin attention will likely be needed here. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 18:07, 5 January 2010 (UTC) reply
If Windows Nashville can stay, then so can Windows Odyssey, and Windows Neptune. Also, there's no sock-puppetry or meat-puppetry involved. Agreement does not amount to that. Stop accusing people of sock-puppetry with no hard evidence.
Were it not for SchmuckyTheCat, no-one would be even here right now. - OBrasilo ( talk) 18:29, 5 January 2010 (UTC) replyStrong Keep here too. these codenames are notable, they are the first compiled codenames of any NT windows to have consumer edition.
as for sock puppetry accusations, there is no hard evidence for that just as obrasilo said above, this is just a single editor (Collectonian) having a personal dislike against obrasilo and me here.
and as obrasilo said above, Windows Nashville is on the same level as these two, yet no one seems to object that one staying.
Lin Godzilla ( talk) 18:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC) reply
— Lin Godzilla ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
*Delete history and redirect. Like I said in the previous AfD: only one source, and of dubious reliability in this case.
Pcap
ping 18:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
reply
Comment these codenames are only marginally related to Windows XP, Id actually propose a combined Windows Neptune and Odyssey article, instead, to combine these two into it.
the codenames resumed development after Windows XP released, using XP codebase this time, I have builds of both, so i know that for a fact. so they werent really codenames for windows xp.
Lin Godzilla ( talk) 19:46, 5 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Even if offline sources exist, well, WP:DRV is thataway if and when someone finds them. Given the extreme overrepresentation of computer-based subjects on the internet, the woeful lack of online sources makes me reluctant to hold my breath. — Korath ( Talk) 10:13, 6 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Lenght, similarity of context and expansion potential are VALID criteria for merger. The criteria for inclusion is what you are campaigning for and I do not contest.
Besides, Odyssey draws half of its notability from the fact the its team joined that of whistler – That's what half of the sources provided say.
Fleet Command ( talk) 12:02, 11 January 2010 (UTC) reply