The result of the debate was Speedy delete by Neutrality. -- Hetar 19:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Admitted original research. User:Zoe| (talk) 18:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Hi, maybe I had the wrong wording for this as it does not constitute an original research. I was in the process of finishing the article first so it could be linked to (if you've noticed it was not) ans sources were not mentioned (it is based on RSSSF Brazil statistics). The aim of the article was to propose first the overall placing of clubs in that period (something which is not available anywhere AFAIK, especially by CBF) accordeing to these sources and a ranking sytem largely based on the official cbf rules. There may be minor tweaks but the idea was to propose a consensual solution and not an original research. Please could you recommend how to do this in wikipedia policy.
Mpbb 18:59, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
reply