The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 06:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)reply
While doing a
WP:BEFORE search, I could only find one review (
The Guardian) by a reliable source. The sources currently used in the article (i.e. Teen-books.com, Shadowcat.name, and Litefoot1969.bravepages.com) do not appear to be
reliable. Unfortunately, I do not think this trilogy of books meets the
WP:GNG criteria for significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources.
Aoba47 (
talk) 08:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete The one inline citation in the article is a non-independent website by the book's author. A Google test shows content mainly about the related TV show and no RIS apart from the one given by the nominator. Failing GNG, the books also don't meet
WP:BK.
Modussiccandi (
talk) 17:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.