The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 17:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Not enougn coverage in
reliable sources to
verify or
sustian article. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP. Coverage seems to focus on the app, which has an article, rather than the company. Notability is not inherited.
JbhTalk 14:16, 12 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Question: does the app really have its own article? Because the wikilink in article-space goes to an article with the same name on an unrelated topic.
CorporateM (
Talk) 00:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
@
CorporateM: no the app does not have an article. The sources being used as refs in the article talk about the app rather than the makers though. I suppose an article on the app could be written assuming the notability standards for video games are low enough.
JbhTalk 00:35, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete the current article; no objection to someone creating an article on the app.
CorporateM (
Talk) 00:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete not notable. Perhaps written for promotion as it's the only edit of its author. sami talk 12:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.