The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 18:17, 8 November 2008 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability, doesn't meet WP:CORP Tan | 39 18:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Like I have stated in the past, This Company has been in my community since I was a kid. They have donated incredible amounts to the community as well have developed and invented many new products.. This company is well worthy of a wiki article and I thought my admission meant the criteria perfectly. I did not advertise, I did not promote, and I did not put any phone numbers or anything like that. In fact, I included links to other water related company wiki articles of which I based the content style of my article on. If those other similar companies with similar wiki pages as the one I just created are allowed then why not the one I created?
If you have any suggestions on how to improve this article to your standards I will accept and implement them accordingly. Thanks ahead of time for your help if I get any. Mike810 ( talk) 18:17, 3 November 2008 (UTC) reply
I honestly do not Beleive these strict rules of wikipedia.. Just because their isnt a description of the company on the internet does not mean it doesnt exist or its products dont exist. This company does in fact distribute Pure Sips but only to military agencies. I put a link to a article on calco LTD which is water one inc (combined companies). It explains the "trailer" which is similar to the pure sip.. The wiki editors deleted the part about the trailer. This company is very notable, just not on the internet. Mike810 ( talk) 15:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC) reply