From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 21:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC) reply

Warsop Stebbing

Warsop Stebbing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage for an encyclopedic entry. Fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 10:52, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete fails WP:ORGCRIT. I updated one of the refs which is just a listing, the other is out of date. No proof of Notability. Spike 'em ( talk) 13:14, 1 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as per nom, the article contains self published references and dead links so it seems to have not established enough notability guidelines. Abishe ( talk) 10:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 13:14, 6 March 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.