From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to K. G. George#Filmography. kelapstick( bainuu) 11:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Vyamoham

Vyamoham (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film. Cannot find anything but trivial mentions of the film in reference to the director and composer BOVINEBOY 2008 15:35, 3 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Err... this topic is not unsourcable. Considering difficulties inherent in souring pre-1990 Indian films, and after two relistings, the last AFd closed just 2 days ago. [1] So pardon me BOVINEBOY... this is maybe a tad too soon to re-nomminate? I suggest that a redirect to its notable director K. G. George might serve the project far better than would deletion. Userfy in the meantime to whomever may wish to work on it. Allow undeletion and return when this film topic is improved. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:40, 3 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note that the previous AFD was closed with no prejudice against speedy nomination. This is a speedy renomination; there should not be prejudice against it. Wieno ( talk) 02:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Considering article got no debate at all (rather than simply failing to reach consensus), and was nominated by another user, I take no issue with relisting. Also, fact that it is difficult or impossible to find sources isn't a reason for keeping article. Will gladly reconsider if someone can find any sources at all, but right now there's nothing supporting keeping it, per WP:MOVIE. mikeman67 ( talk) 20:59, 3 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - As the previous nominator, I still believe that this doesn't meet WP:MOVIE. If anyone can find any sources, I'm open to changing my mind, but I couldn't (though there's the language barrier to consider). Wieno ( talk) 02:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.