The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC) reply
non-notable application with no reliable, third party sources (just first party, wiki ones) describing significance. Being a "provider" for one or two notable business does not satisfy inclusion. WP:PROD, which was endorsed by another user, was removed by original article creators with no reasoning. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 16:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC) reply
My concern really is about the definition of what a "notable or non-notable software application" is, particularly in the case of proprietary systems. If notability criterion is to be applied across the board in this category, many existing articles in Wikipedia should probably be deleted too. For example, why is Expression Engine more notable application than Vivvo? Or, what are reliable third party sources for the entry for Site Foundry. Let's talk about more universal standards before we decide on deleting individual entries. -- Mskoric ( talk) 13:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC) reply