The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Overly wordy article for what appears to be a very regional phenomenon. Only RS is the Oregonian article, cited a half-dozen times. Rest are trivial mentions or non RS. Nothing found for this individual, only for the phase.
Oaktree b (
talk) 04:07, 9 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.