The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC) reply
This article is a technical description and has nothing more to add. hence, it belongs more to Wiktionary Wikishagnik ( talk) 19:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC) reply
Albeit I am biased, being that I wrote the article, but I believe as a reference for someone researching film projection this is important. I always view Wikipedia as a reference and when I couldn't find anything on VPF, I felt it worth creating an article for reference.
Encyclopedia Reference
The article is a bit of a stub and could use some more work, but I'm not sure it should be deleted. Maybe it should be absorbed into the Digital Cinema page if it can't function as a standalone?
I'm not quite clear why you find this a "technical description" could you please clarify what about the article makes it a technical description and less of an encyclopedia entry? I would be happy to change the aspects that make it seem like a technical description! Wikitionary v. Wikipedia AzryckAnin ( talk) 00:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC) reply