The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Swedish industrial metal band. The article has a multiple issues tag on it, including notability and improve references. This is always a bad sign. But the sourcing in the article is abysmal indeed - dead links and unreliable looking sites. The only reliable source I have found is an album review on Metal.de, and that's it. The rest of the results are the usual junk like databases, streaming links, youtube videos and retail sites. No evidence of notable members or labels. The Swedish page has even worse sourcing - actually, it isn't sourcing, just the band's official site.
GhostDestroyer100 (
talk) 16:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for
lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for
soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --
Cewbot (
talk) 00:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails notability guidelines. No reliable sources cited.
‡ Єl Cid of Valenciatalk 15:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.