The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Doesn't seem to meet the criterion for
WP:NOTABILITY, and also seems self-promotional, in a sense...
TJH2018talk 19:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Okay, thanks for notice. I am not trying to self-promote, rather to create an entry about this annual event that is strictly factual, describing the event. Please advise what steps can be taken to keep this article online! Thanks
Jeremyjmartin (
talk) 19:28, 11 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Please tell more about the VintageAirRally, the website only has limited information. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
94.225.75.202 (
talk) 16:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep Clear notability with sourcing to The TimesDaily Mail, and BBC. Thank you to
Jeremyjmartin for those references.
WP:BEFORE seems to have been skipped, because even a simple Google News search brings back further references from multiple other
WP:RSEggishorn(talk)(contrib) 17:04, 22 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton |
Talk 02:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.