- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America 1000 05:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Vidya Prakasananda Giri Swamy
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Vidya Prakasananda Giri Swamy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable person. The article looks very much like a promotional effort. Fails WP:GNG. - MRRaja001 ( talk) 10:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 March 16. — cyberbot I Talk to my owner:Online 10:35, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see any significant coverage in reliable sources. Article is itself a promotional piece. Azuredivay ( talk) 03:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete while the nom's assertion that's promotional is undoubtedly true (up to and including someone's phone number at the bottom!), that's actually an argument to avoid, as it can be dealt with elsewhere. But, it is true that the basic notability guidelines at WP:ANYBIO are clearly not met, lacking as the article does any indication of the topic having received broad coverage in third-party, independent reliable sources. And a WP:BEFORE search indicates a further dearth of such in both the relevant literature and news outlets. —— SN 54129 11:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.