From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 14:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Victoria Valentine

Victoria Valentine (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV. The article may have been created by the subject themselves. vistadan 14:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Women, and New York. Skynxnex ( talk) 14:24, 27 October 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NAUTHOR. I could find no independent reviews or other kinds of sources on this person or her works. Additionally, her books are all published by Water Forest Press Publishing which the author founded. In effect these books are self published. Not sure if the press itself is notable either. 4meter4 ( talk) 14:32, 27 October 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete no sources found, every hit is for a BBC presenter with the same name. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:51, 27 October 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. A Google search found articles covering the subject's name change, which hardly make her notable. Badly fails WP:GNG and does not pass WP:BASIC. - AuthorAuthor ( talk) 23:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NAUTHOR. Agree this is probably autobiography of non-notable writer. WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 01:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Although the claim that the article was created by a subject is not based on any argument by the nominating editor, the page does not deserve to be in Wikipedia as failing to meet basic notability requirements listed by the editors in the comments above. Idunnox3 ( talk) 23:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete While her work may exist, a failure of WP:SIGCOV. She is not notable enough for inclusion. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.