From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 13:34, 24 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Victoria University of Barbados

Victoria University of Barbados (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. On February 8, 2018, the school was mentioned in passing in articles on the Barbados government web site and in NationNews, but no coverage has appeared in any of the major Barbadian news sites (e.g. NationNews, The Barbados Advocate, Barbados Today, Loop News) since the Washington University of Barbados scandal broke in October 2018 (several months after the national elections and change in government). Article creator and main contributor was a banned sockpuppet account. Cielquiparle ( talk) 10:47, 17 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Also recommend possibly salting this article, as there seems to be some history here. CC:@ Joseph2302 Cielquiparle ( talk) 11:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.